19.6 C
New York
Wednesday, August 20, 2025

magic the gathering – Activating an artifact in response to its destruction, or destroying it to forestall activation


I requested Google two seemingly contradictory variations of a query about fundamental MtG mechanics:

  • Can I activate an artifact earlier than it is destroyed?
  • Can I destroy an artifact earlier than it prompts?

And Google’s AI delivered a assured ‘Sure!’ to each. Is that this appropriate, or is the AI gaslighting me?

The particular situation that acquired me questioning concerned Nevinyrral’s Disk. Say that is on the board and the controlling participant is ready to pay it is activation price. An opponent casts Disenchant on it. Can the controller reply to this by activating the disk earlier than the disenchant resolves?

Google’s AI says they’ll. Okay. So then flip it round. The controlling participant acts first, and prompts the disk. An opponent responds with Disenchant. Does this forestall the disk’s capability from activating?

Google’s AI additionally says sure. Is that this all appropriate?

Assuming it’s, does this imply that being the primary actor is actively disincentivized? As in, if the opponent desires to ensure the disk can’t be used they need to wait to destroy it till the controller tries to make use of it. By the identical token, if the controller desires to make sure it fires, they need to await an opponent to attempt to destroy it first?

And does this create a state of affairs the place if an opponent initiates the disenchant and the controller responds by activating the artifact, the opponent can reply with a second disenchant, wherein case the activation is blocked (except the controller has a method to pay the activation price once more, advert infinitum?)? This appears nonsensical.

Is it truly how the sport mechanics work, or if not, what occurs in every situation?

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles