One of many causes that quantitative bids work is that you’re unlikely to be off two cashing tips when associate has a most. For that motive, counting distribution is harmful. This hand is actually price inviting slam, however associate could have a tough time evaluating for those who bid 4NT instantly.
Think about associate holding Qx KJTxx AKx Kxx. This hand seems to be like a transparent acceptance to me: good controls, supply of tips, higher half of the vary, however you might be off two aces. Alternatively, think about associate holding Axxx Kxx Axx ATx. This seems to be like a transparent go of 4NT: minimal values, horrible form. However this hand has an honest probability to make an overtrick in 6S (however 6NT is prone to go down).
For those who inform associate about your form, you may have an opportunity of staying out of slam with the primary hand and you are a shoe-in to get to slam on the second.
With a hand that is a bit much less shapely, you may switch to spades after which bid 4NT quantitative; you would possibly do this with Kxxxx AQx Qx QJx. With this hand, it’s best to switch to spades, then bid 3C, after which in all probability make one other transfer.
With the primary hand, the public sale might go
1NT 2H
2S 3C
3H 4C
4NT (4NT is a suggestion to play)
or
1NT 2H
2S 3C
3NT 4NT (4NT is quantitative)
or
1NT 2H
2S 3C
3NT
(opener would possibly go or settle for 4NT within the second sequence; they’ve good controls however suspect that their coronary heart swimsuit is not such a very good supply of tips with little assist anticipated from associate).
With the second hand, the public sale might go
1NT 2H
2S 3C
3S 4D (3S units trumps, 4D is a cue bid denying a membership management)
4NT 5H (opener has golf equipment and hearts managed so asks for key playing cards)
5NT 6S (we've all of the keycards, grand attempt)
